Ford Focus. 3,9/5. Opel Astra. 3,7/5. Renault Megane. 3,7/5. Über 31 Tests & Erfahrungen für Peugeot 307 CC (2003–2009) Peugeot News Peugeot Informationen & technische Daten Bilder & Videos Preise. Peugeot 307 Models Price and Specs. The price range for the Peugeot 307 varies based on the trim level you choose. Starting at $6,050 and going to $9,020 for the latest year the model was manufactured. The model range is available in the following body types starting from the engine/transmission specs shown below. Year. 640 Gebrauchte ab € 600,-. Opel Zafira e-Life. 123 Gebrauchte ab € 800,-. Wer den Peugeot 307 CC als Gebrauchtwagen kauft, erhält das Fahrzeug aus den Baujahren 2003 bis 2009 und daher in einer großen Preisspanne. Zudem steht der Peugeot 307 CC mit verschiedenen Motorvarianten und Ausstattungsversionen zur Verfügung. Volkswagen Beetle Cabriolet Conventional fabric roof but distinctive looks and sound build quality. Renault Megane CC Similar packaging to 307 CC but with clever glass roof. Saab 9-3 Convertible Attractive and well built but no diesel option, expensive to buy. Audi A4 Cabriolet High quality car with strong image, although a pricey choice . 307 CC "vs" Megane Cabriolet ReedyAero Original Poster 353 posts 156 months Wednesday 4th January 2012 Wednesday 4th January 2012 GBDG 896 posts 134 months Wednesday 4th January 2012 Has to be the 3 series! I seem to remember reading that the 307cc is the car least likely to be driven by a man, based on insurance records. 0a 23,655 posts 174 months Wednesday 4th January 2012 ReedyAero said: Would like something that is not too bad a steer ReedyAero said: I have narrowed it down to the 307 CC and the MeganeAmusing. Wednesday 4th January 2012 Saab 9-3 springs to mind! Wednesday 4th January 2012 Why have the feminine (& fwd) cars over the great sounding 328? Get the BMW, you know it makes sense. Wednesday 4th January 2012 0a said: ReedyAero said: Would like something that is not too bad a steer ReedyAero said: I have narrowed it down to the 307 CC and the Cancer or AIDS? Wednesday 4th January 2012 As mentioned above, BMW is the one to go for. The M52 is a peach. Delightfully torquey with a (deceptively) smooth delivery. Would suit an auto why not a cabrio equivalent of the SAAB?307CC and Megane Cabrio = for girls. Wednesday 4th January 2012 g3org3y said: As mentioned above, BMW is the one to go for. The M52 is a peach. Delightfully torquey with a (deceptively) smooth delivery. Would suit an auto why not a cabrio equivalent of the SAAB?307CC and Megane Cabrio = for experienced my Mum's Megane Cabrio when she had it i'd recommend not buying one. Slow, thirsty, uncomfortable, camp, handle terribly, faulty (it will be faulty). Also the only thing more imasculating than driving one is having to take it to Renault to have a headlight or indicator bulb changed (which you will have to, about twice a week) unless you have the time and inclination to faff about doing it yourself (which you won't wnat to becuase you might break a nail, which will be a concern for you, becuase you'll own a Megane Cabrio).BMW all the way... J4CKO 36,940 posts 180 months Wednesday 4th January 2012 There is the Eos, Astra version and the Ford thing with a tin roof as well but cant imagine any are the last word in fun. Wednesday 4th January 2012 E46 convertible every had a brand new 206CC and it was the worst car we have ever typical French build quality but 10 times worse. I hated it so much we got rid after a year. Wednesday 4th January 2012 aka_kerrly said: Says its a 318 so pretty slow especially as a convertible, it does look lovely though, I always thought those wheels looked superb. W00DY 14,894 posts 206 months Wednesday 4th January 2012 Wednesday 4th January 2012 Go not think of a worse 'steer' than a 307 CC?! Wednesday 4th January 2012 surprised no one has said mx-5 yet...... Wednesday 4th January 2012 Noesph said: surprised no one has said mx-5 yet......Doesn't seat 4 Wednesday 4th January 2012 hornetrider said: 0a said: ReedyAero said: Would like something that is not too bad a steer ReedyAero said: I have narrowed it down to the 307 CC and the Cancer or AIDS?The Megane isn't bad, my fat-bottomed hatch was certainly good fun on the right road. Can't speak for the CC though... Build quality and electrical/mechanical reliability though, run for the fking hills!If the 307 is anything like our 308 I'd imagine you'll find the ride harsh, badly damped, the driving position an uncomfortable hybrid between VW Transporter and Golf, and the gearbox loose, indirect and lazy. Other than that, it's not a bad be looking for a 6-cylinder E46, a or 9-3 or a quattro Audi A4 Cabrio. Wednesday 4th January 2012 Guys, you may want to change your postcode on AT before posting links. You can never be too careful Wednesday 4th January 2012 why drive when you can waft: Wednesday 4th January 2012 T7G said: Guys, you may want to change your postcode on AT before posting links. You can never be too careful true true, must be careful of PH stalkers.....Point take though even though I'm fortunate in that no sat nav has ever got anyone to my front door from my postcode. Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff Posting Rules HOME page / compare / Peugeot 307 CC vs Renault Megane Coupe-Cabriolet 16V Compare two cars 2005. - 2008. C - Small family car cabriolet, 2 door front Badges Production Vehicle class Body style Wheel drive Safety 2006. - 2008. C - Small family car cabriolet, 2 door front Dimensons & Outlines Length Width Height Boot (min) Boot (max) Fuel tank 2005 Peugeot 307 CC 2006 Renault Megane Coupe-Cabriolet © GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited. Engine Petrol 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Nat. Asp. Engine Fuel Configuration Aspiration Displacement Power Torque Petrol 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Nat. Asp. Performance (manual gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Performance (automatic gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Expenses Virtual Adviser's™ opinion Overview Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the small family car segment and utilize the same 2-door cabriolet body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific petrol engine choice they offer. The first one has a Peugeot-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 109hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 112hp engine designed by Renault. Safety The first thing to look into here would be the results from European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) tests performed on the two cars. Good thing is that both vehicles got tested, with the Renault being a slightly better choice apparently. Moving further on, let's take a closer look at some additional safety-related facts. Both vehicles belong to the small family car segment, which is generally classifying them somewhere in the middle safety-wise, still it doesn't help us solve our dilemma, does it? Furthermore, when it comes to weight, a factor that most people underestimate, 307 offers a considerable difference of 10% more metal. Reliability Reliability is not the best thing to consider on the make level, but it is worth mentioning that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, when all the models are taken into account. These are the official statistics, while our visitors describe reliability of Peugeot with an average rating of and models under the Renault badge with out of 5. The same official information place 307 as average reliability-wise, and Megane is more or less at the same it all, drivers of cars with the same engine as 307 rank it on average as while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets out of 5. Performance & Fuel economy Renault is a bit more agile, reaching 100km/h in seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 195 kilometers per hour, 4km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy things look pretty much the same for both cars, averaging around liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (39 mpg), in combined cycle. Verdict Peugeot appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In this case though, it seems that both cars show similar levels of passenger protection all together, so that won't break a tie. But one thing that actually could is the performance, with Renault offering somewhat better performance, just enough to call it quicker. To make things even better, it consumps less fuel! I believe that, when we take all into account, we have only one winner here - the Renault. In any case that's my personal view, built upon all the data available to me. What should decide here though is the way you feel about the two vehicles, and I hope you'll find my guidelines useful in the process. In case you have two minutes to spare I invite you to define your needs, desires and budget and see which car would be chosen by the virtual adviser™, among more than different ones in our database. Check a car by its VIN number You are hereCar reviews › Peugeot › Peugeot 308cc 2009-2014 From £20,5597 The Peugeot 308CC is a product from the masters of the coupe cabriolet, but is it their best effort yet? Introduction Design & styling Interior Engines & performance Ride & handling MPG & running costs Verdict Prices & specs Used car deals Peugeot makes more coupé-cabriolets than anyone else, and is by far the most successful manufacturer of the breed with a quarter of the European market. It has a long history in making them. This certainly heritage bodes well for the 308 CC. There were coupé-cabriolet Peugeots before the second world war, even; the 401, 601 and 602 Eclipse models pioneered the format in the 1930s. Advanced as they were, the Eclipses were expensive, low-volume models, however: the company’s post-war coupé-cabriolets have been built in far larger numbers. However, the original year 2000 206 CC nearly didn’t happen at all. The company was concerned that this complicated, relatively high-cost small car would not sell in enough volume to turn a profit. Spurred on by the success of the 1996 Mercedes SLK though, which proved the readiness of the European market to buy retractable hardtop convertibles again, Peugeot took the risk – and was duly rewarded with the generous spoils so often earned by those first to a new market niche. Not that the original 206 and 307 CC were flawless; patchy roof reliability, floppy bodies and compromised packaging undermined their functionality, but not enough to prevent them from gathering a following strong enough, even, to translate into particularly laudable secondhand values. Peugeot has since worked hard to purge the 207 CC of its predecessor’s shortcomings, and with some success. The question here is whether it has repeated the feat with the 308 CC, the larger C-segment convertible offered up against Renault’s Megane CC and VW’s Eos. GoodConvenience of roofEngaging dynamicsDetail design and finishBadConfined rear seatsLeisurely performanceOver-firm urban ride Used cars for sale NewsletterGet all the best car news, reviews and opinions direct to your inbox three times a week. You can unsubscribe via any email we send See our full privacy notice for more details Subscribe Never miss an issue of the world's oldest car magazine – subscribe to Autocar magazine today. Subscribe Peugeot 308cc 2009-2014 First drives how about 6 series cab? 6 series out of my reach. If got that kind of money, then the e cab would be my choice! It will be a second car for me, short term ( < 2yrs) low mileage, once in your life kind of fun experience, so long-term maintenance not really a big issue. After driving for 15 years, perhaps it's ok to put aside all the negatives which I used to consider, and just do it! I have 2 young kids, so mx5, which I personally like, is out. I also thought of the 207, but the rear is really really tight - not even my young ones can fit in there! Eos is also good, however, resale not many and super ex. So, still back to the first 2 choices.

peugeot 307 cc vs renault megane cabrio